![]() She and her husband, who is a stay-at-home dad, bought a house and barn on three acres to raise their two little boys. ![]() ![]() “It has ramifications that really just affect every woman, every family, that wants to have children.” Staying in KentuckyĪs the midday sun glistened on Lake Cumberland, Fields knelt down to feed her backyard chickens. This won't just affect people seeking abortions, said McKay Cunningham, who teaches reproductive rights and constitutional law at the College of Idaho. ![]() Amy Domeyer-Klenske, who chairs the Wisconsin section of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. And among the 24 states that have taken steps to restrict abortion, all but Ohio will see an even bigger need by then, according to The Associated Press' analysis of the federal data.Ībortion restrictions, combined with the challenges of practicing in rural areas, threaten to expand so-called “maternal care deserts," said Dr. That figures jump to more than 50% in Kentucky, Idaho and some other states with restrictive abortion laws.įederal projections show a widening gulf between supply and demand for OB-GYNs nationally through 2035. Nationally, 44% of counties had low or no access to obstetric providers, according to a 2022 March of Dimes report based on data gathered before the Supreme Court ruling. Plus, she said, “there's a big need for providers in general in terms of reproductive health care.” She practices in a conservative rural county and can no longer provide abortions part-time in Louisville like she once did.įields feels an intense connection to her state and hopes to foster change from within. Alecia Fields moved back to her native Kentucky around the time news first leaked about the Supreme Court’s ruling. Some doctors make a different choice than Cooper. That figures jump to more than 50% in Kentucky, Idaho and some other states with restrictive abortion laws Nationally, 44% of counties had low or no access to obstetric providers, according to a 2022 March of Dimes report based on data gathered before the Supreme Court ruling.She practices in a conservative rural county and can no longer provide abortions part-time in Louisville like she once did They must weigh tough questions about medical ethics, their own families and whether they can provide the best care without risking their careers or even winding up in prison.Wade, many maternal care doctors in restrictive states face the same stark choice: Stay or go? They know a lot is at stake for patients, too, due to current and projected widespread maternal care shortages in the U.S. Post-Roe, many maternal care doctors in restrictive states face the same stark choice: Stay or go? They must weigh tough questions about medical ethics, their own families and whether they can provide the best care without risking their careers or even winding up in prison. But they needed to be “where we felt that reproductive health care was protected and safe.” “Obviously it was a very difficult decision for me and my family," she said. Cooper felt “deeply saddened” she couldn’t care for her the way she normally would have.Īnd this is one of the reasons Cooper, a maternal-fetal specialist, moved in April to Minnesota, which has broad abortion rights. ![]() Wade in June, so Smith had to go to Washington state. But Idaho banned nearly all abortions after the U.S. Smith said she chose to end a desperately wanted pregnancy last year after discovering her fetus had potentially deadly heart defects and other problems. One who often comes to mind is Kayla Smith. Kylie Cooper chokes up thinking about the patients she left behind in Idaho. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |